Tangzu Wan’er 2 Review: Smooth Sophistication on a Budget

Pros:
• Exceptionally well-tuned midrange – natural, organic vocals with beautiful tone and timbre
• Refined and balanced tuning – feels more mature compared to the original Wan’er
• Clean, controlled bass – no bloat or excessive boom
• Non-fatiguing treble – smooth, detailed enough without harshness or sibilance
• Improved stock cable – more premium feel, 4.4mm option is a plus
• Included Tang Sancai tips – comfortable and synergize well with the tuning
• Great value – sounds like a set in the $50–80 range, not a sub-$30 one
• Comfortable fit and build – same lightweight, ergonomic shell as the OG

Cons: 
• Bass may feel too tame for bass lovers – lacks the fun or rumble of the OG Wan’er
• Treble is on the safer side – not the most airy or micro-detailed
• Soundstage is just average – doesn’t add a lot of space or depth
• Separation can suffer in busy tracks – layering isn’t its strongest suit
• No major design refresh – same shell as the OG might feel too familiar for some

Tangzu is no stranger to making budget-friendly IEMs that punch above their weight, and with the release of the Wan’er 2, they’ve decided to give their much-loved entry-level model a well-earned sequel. Now, sequels in audio can be hit-or-miss—some improve, some stray too far—but the Wan’er 2? It genuinely feels like a matured, polished continuation of the original, and then some.

Whats in the Box? here is my quick unboxing video of the Tangzu Waner 2:

Build & Accessories: Familiar, but Better
The Wan’er 2 shares the same design and build as the original Wan’er SG—those familiar plastic shells, comfortable ergonomic fit, and that lightweight, forget-you’re-wearing-it feel. The faceplate has a sleek look, though nothing too flashy. This time around, Tangzu includes three pairs of the Tang Sancai standard bore tips, which are quite popular among budget IEM lovers for a reason—they fit well, seal better than average and on some cases can help if your IEM have some driver flex, and most importantly, they don’t mess with the tuning.

Another notable upgrade: the stock cable. It’s now more pliable, has a cleaner aesthetic, and my unit came terminated with a 4.4mm balanced jack, which is a welcome change for those of us living in balanced-output ecosystems. It’s not boutique-tier but it’s miles better than the old stock cable that shipped with the OG Wan’er.

Sound Impressions
Tested using the included Tang Sancai medium tips and various sources, the Wan’er 2 surprised me with its level of refinement. Both channels are perfectly balanced, and it’s one of those rare occasions where the graph really does tell the sonic story—smooth, mature, and tastefully tuned.

Bass:
The bass on the Wan’er 2 has grown up. Compared to the OG’s more fun and boosted low end, this new version dials things back a bit. The sub-bass is clean, with less rumble and a more neutral presence. The midbass is punchy and tight, with a slight roll-off that keeps things from getting too warm or muddy.
Don’t expect head-rattling slam or excessive texture down low—this is a disciplined, refined bass presentation. It’s not dry or dull, just more polite and controlled. Great for those who appreciate accuracy over fun, though bassheads may feel it’s a touch too polite.

Midrange:
The midrange is exceptionally well-tuned, with a natural tone and timbre that make both male and female vocals sound rich and realistic. There's a lush, organic quality to vocals that gives the Wan’er 2 an emotional, inviting character.
The upper mids are slightly more forward than the OG, which adds clarity and presence, especially for female vocals and acoustic instruments. However, there’s a gentle roll-off toward the lower treble, which softens the edge and adds a bit of warmth. It’s a nice balance—forward enough to be engaging, but never shouty or harsh.

Treble:
Treble here leans toward the laid-back side, which will be a blessing for treble-sensitive listeners. It’s clean and non-sibilant, with a decent amount of detail retrieval but not overly airy or sparkly. There’s just enough extension to keep things from sounding dull or veiled, but detail lovers might crave a bit more crispness.
This is a “sit back and enjoy” kind of treble—not one that throws every microdetail in your face, but one that lets the music flow smoothly without fatigue.

Soundstage & Imaging: Adequate and Competent
The soundstage is about average—not wide or deep enough to make you think you’re in a concert hall, but also not so narrow that it feels congested. It’s... just enough. What impressed me more was the imaging, which is actually quite precise for the price. Instruments are easy to locate, and there's a clear sense of left, right, and center.
Separation is okay—not bad, not spectacular. In complex passages, things can feel a little less defined, but for most genres and daily listening, it's entirely serviceable.

Comparisons

vs Kefine Delci
Both the Wan’er 2 and Kefine Delci sit in the ultra-competitive budget IEM space, and both are shockingly competent for their price—but they approach sound from different philosophies.

Tuning & Tonal Balance
• Wan’er 2 leans toward a neutral-warm Harman-inspired signature, with an emphasis on natural vocals, smooth mids, and a relaxed treble.
• Delci, on the other hand, brings in a mild V-shaped tuning, with a bit more bass punch and upper-mid energy, making it more lively and forward in presentation.

• Wan’er 2: smoother, warmer, more refined and natural
• Delci: punchier, more dynamic, with brighter energy and contrast
Bass
• The Delci has a slightly more pronounced and punchier midbass, giving it more impact and fun for genres like pop and hip-hop.
• The Wan’er 2 takes a more controlled and subtle approach, with tight subbass and rolled-off midbass, better for acoustic, vocals, or jazz where bass restraint is appreciated.

• Delci: more fun, engaging, with slightly better slam
• Wan’er 2: more refined, controlled, and less intrusive
Midrange
• The Wan’er 2 excels here with its natural tone and timbre. Vocals—especially male and female alike—sound lush, organic, and emotionally engaging.
• The Delci’s mids are also solid, but slightly more recessed in the lower mids compared to the Wan’er 2. Female vocals can be a bit more forward due to the Delci’s brighter upper midrange.

• Wan’er 2: better balance, fuller, more relaxed vocals
• Delci: slightly thinner, brighter mids with more vocal clarity but less warmth
Treble
• The Delci has more sparkle, especially in the lower treble—it feels more open, slightly airier, and has more perceived detail.
• The Wan’er 2 is more laid-back, smoother in the treble, and non-fatiguing, but trades off some clarity and microdetail.

• Delci: brighter and more open, might get hot at times
• Wan’er 2: smooth and safe, great for long listening
Technical Performance
• Imaging & Separation: Delci edges ahead slightly with more precise instrument placement and slightly sharper separation.
• Soundstage: Both are average, but Delci feels a touch wider due to its more energetic top-end.
• Detail Retrieval: Delci comes across as crisper, but Wan’er 2 handles timbre and realism better.

Which One Should You Pick?
• Go Wan’er 2 if you prefer natural mids, smooth treble, and non-fatiguing tuning—perfect for vocals, acoustic, indie, jazz, or just long relaxing sessions.
• Pick Delci if you enjoy a more dynamic, energetic sound, with more bass punch, brighter upper mids, and more sparkle—great for pop, EDM, rock, or anyone who likes their music with a bit more “bite.”

vs Tripowin Vivace

• Vivace, by contrast, leans into a fun-first tuning, with a bold V-shape, strong bass, and lively upper mids and treble. It’s unapologetically colored.
• Wan’er 2: Relaxed and musical, tuned for natural vocals and long-term listening
• Vivace: Energetic and punchy, tuned for excitement and contrast

Bass
• Vivace throws in big bass energy, especially in the subbass. It rumbles deep, slams hard, and unapologetically colors the sound.
• Wan’er 2 has a more restrained, controlled bass, with tighter subbass and less midbass bloom. It’s cleaner and more neutral down low.

• Vivace: big, fun bass with strong impact—basshead-approved
• Wan’er 2: tight and refined—better for balance and genre versatility
Midrange
• Wan’er 2’s mids are the highlight—natural tone, slightly warm, with good weight and excellent timbre. Vocals are front and center, lush and easy on the ears.
• Vivace’s mids are recessed, especially male vocals which can sound a little thin or veiled compared to the punchy bass and forward upper

mids.
• Wan’er 2: better mids, richer vocal presentation, more natural
• Vivace: more scooped mids, especially for male vocals

Upper Mids & Treble
• Vivace is brighter and more sparkly, with an elevated upper midrange that gives energy and bite to vocals and instruments. But it can be peaky and fatiguing at times, especially with female vocals or sibilant tracks.
• Wan’er 2 plays it safer—smoother and more relaxed in the upper mids and lower treble, but at the expense of microdetail and air.
• Vivace: energetic and detailed, but may get harsh at high volumes
• Wan’er 2: smooth and laid-back, better for treble-sensitive listeners
Technical Performance
• Detail Retrieval: Vivace reveals more microdetail and edge due to its treble lift, but Wan’er 2 handles macro detail and realism better.
• Imaging & Separation: Slight edge to Vivace due to the extra treble clarity, but Wan’er 2 keeps up with cleaner midrange layering.
• Soundstage: Both are average, but Vivace feels wider due to its brighter presentation.

• Vivace: feels technically sharper but also more artificial
• Wan’er 2: more coherent and organic

Build, Fit & Accessories
• Both are lightweight and comfortable, but the Wan’er 2 wins with the Tang Sancai tips and a better cable, especially with the 4.4mm option.
• Vivace looks flashier, but some may find the fit less secure due to its shape and nozzle angle.

Which One Should You Pick?
• Get the Wan’er 2 if you want something mature, balanced, and natural-sounding with rich mids and no harsh edges. Great for vocals, acoustic, lo-fi, jazz, and chillout music.
• Go with the Vivace if you want a bass-heavy, bright, and lively IEM for EDM, hip-hop, pop, or rock—something that wakes you up rather than soothes you.

vs Kefine Klean

Think of the Wan’er 2 as the smooth-talking charmer — warm, organic, and easy to listen to.
The Kefine Klean, on the other hand, is the clean-cut professional — more refined, balanced, and articulate, like a grown-up version of the Delci with polished shoes and a crisper accent.

Tuning & Tonality
• Wan’er 2 is tuned for warmth and musicality. It has a relaxed, slightly colored presentation that leans into smoothness rather than precision.
• Klean leans closer to a neutral-ish U-shape with tighter bass, lush mids, and a better-controlled treble. There’s more clarity and balance without sacrificing musicality.
• Wan’er 2: Warm, mellow, emotional
• Klean: Balanced, clean, more technical but still engaging

Bass
• Wan’er 2 bass is pleasant, moderately elevated but not particularly fast or textured. Subbass is cleaner than OG Wan’er, but overall it's more about presence than definition.
• Klean bass is tighter, punchier, and faster-decaying. Subbass has a more focused presence, and midbass is better controlled — overall, it's more articulate and “grown-up” sounding.

• Wan’er 2: Smooth, slightly rounded, less detailed
• Klean: Punchy, textured, well-separated

Midrange
• Wan’er 2 mids are its sweet spot — vocals come across as lush, organic, and weighty. Instruments sound natural but not ultra-detailed.
• Klean mids are cleaner, slightly more forward, and better separated. Vocals are vivid with excellent tonality, especially with the black nozzle which brings more air and crispness. It’s less warm than Wan’er 2 but more precise.

• Wan’er 2: Warm, intimate, forgiving
• Klean: Clear, well-separated, slightly brighter

Treble
• Wan’er 2 treble is laid-back and inoffensive. It avoids sibilance and harshness but lacks air and sparkle.
• Klean treble is better extended, more open-sounding, and has a gentle crispness that gives music more life and detail. Still smooth, but more present.

• Wan’er 2: Safe, non-fatiguing
• Klean: Smooth, but clearer and more revealing

Technical Performance
• Detail retrieval: Klean edges ahead, especially in micro-details and clarity.
• Soundstage: Both have average width, but Klean has slightly better depth and separation.
• Imaging & separation: Klean is more precise and cleaner, making it easier to track instruments in complex tracks.
• Dynamics: Klean is punchier and livelier; Wan’er 2 is softer and more laid-back.
Build, Fit & Accessories
• Wan’er 2 is lightweight and ergonomic. Its updated cable (especially in 4.4mm) and Tang Sancai tips are solid.
• Klean feels more premium with its metallic housing and sleeker design. Fit is just as comfy, and interchangeable nozzles (silver and black) give you mild tuning flexibility.
Which Should You Get?
• Go for Wan’er 2 if you want a cozy, warm, and relaxed IEM for chill listening — especially if you’re treble-sensitive or just want something easy and musical.
• Pick Klean if you want a more refined, technically capable, and balanced listen with better clarity and control — a great all-rounder that still feels enjoyable and not clinical.

The Waner 2 plays it safe but does it well — smooth, pleasing, and instantly likable.
The Kefine Klean steps it up with more polish, control, and resolution, making it the better option if you want something that can scale with higher-quality sources and more detailed music.

vs EPZ Q1 Pro
This is a bit like comparing a mellow jazz singer (Wan’er 2) with a high-energy pop vocalist (Q1 Pro).
Both are enjoyable and crowd-pleasing, but the Wan’er 2 goes for a smoother, more organic presentation, while the Q1 Pro is all about energy, clarity, and a more forward sound.
Tuning & Tonality
• Wan’er 2 is warm and mature, with a slightly relaxed tuning that emphasizes lush mids and smoothness across the board.
• Q1 Pro leans more into a modern Harman-esque tuning, with lifted upper mids and treble for added energy and sparkle. It’s the more vibrant-sounding IEM.
Summary:
• Wan’er 2: Warm, soft-edged, musical
• Q1 Pro: Clean, energetic, crisp

Bass
• Wan’er 2 has a tighter, more refined bass compared to the OG Wan’er. Subbass is clean, but there's not a lot of rumble. Midbass is punchy, slightly rolled-off, and doesn’t overwhelm.
• Q1 Pro’s bass is snappier and more elevated, especially in the subbass. It has better slam and a slightly more exciting low-end, though it can sometimes overshadow the mids if you’re sensitive to that lift.
Summary:
• Wan’er 2: Refined, less aggressive
• Q1 Pro: More impact, slightly boomier

Midrange
• Wan’er 2’s mids are lush, warm, and natural-sounding. Vocals — especially male — have a nice body and weight. Female vocals are smooth but not super forward.
• Q1 Pro’s mids are more forward and energetic, especially in the upper mids. Female vocals sound brighter and clearer, but there’s less warmth and body than the Wan’er 2. It’s cleaner but more prone to sharpness in shouty recordings.
Summary:
• Wan’er 2: Smooth, laid-back mids
• Q1 Pro: Clearer, more energetic, a bit leaner

Treble
• Wan’er 2 treble is laid-back, non-fatiguing, and forgiving. It doesn’t sparkle much, but it avoids harshness and sibilance.
• Q1 Pro’s treble is more pronounced — brighter, crisper, and better for detail retrieval. It can be more exciting, but also slightly fatiguing on longer sessions for treble-sensitive folks.

• Wan’er 2: Soft, polite, gentle
• Q1 Pro: Brighter, more detailed, slightly aggressive
Technical Performance
• Detail retrieval: Q1 Pro has the upper hand — it brings out more texture and micro-details, particularly in the treble region.
• Soundstage: Both are fairly average, but the Q1 Pro feels slightly wider due to the brighter tuning and airier top end.
• Imaging & separation: Q1 Pro again edges ahead here — it’s easier to track instruments in complex tracks. Wan’er 2 is more blended and rounded, which some may actually prefer for casual listening.
• Dynamics: Q1 Pro sounds more lively and dynamic. Wan’er 2 is smoother but can come off a bit soft by comparison.
Build, Fit & Accessories
• Wan’er 2 keeps the same great ergonomic shell as the original, and now includes better tips (Tangzu’s Sancai tips) and an improved stock cable — especially if you got the 4.4 version.
• Q1 Pro has a more solid-feeling metal shell, a good-quality cable, and a decent set of tips. Its build feels more premium, but the fit may be a bit chunky for smaller ears.
Which Should You Get?
• Go for Wan’er 2 if you value smooth, organic mids, a laid-back presentation, and forgiving treble. It’s great for longer listening sessions, vocal music, and those sensitive to upper-mid sharpness.
• Pick Q1 Pro if you want energy, detail, and punch — a livelier, more dynamic IEM that works great for modern pop, EDM, and tracks where sparkle and speed matter.

The Wan’er 2 is the safer, more mature-tuned option. The Q1 Pro is sharper, more exciting, and technically a step ahead — but it demands a bit more tolerance for brightness and upper-mid energy.
If the Wan’er 2 is like sipping hot tea on a rainy afternoon, the Q1 Pro is more like an iced coffee shot before a workout. It just depends on what kind of energy you’re in the mood for.

vs Simgot EA500
These two IEMs may live in the same sub-$100 category, but the EA500 often punches above its class with bold energy and clarity, while the Wan’er 2 takes the more mature, easygoing route.

Tuning & Tonality
• Wan’er 2 follows a smoother, warmer Harman-inspired curve. It’s tuned to please — warm mids, relaxed treble, nothing offensive.
• EA500 comes with two nozzle tunings (red and black), both of which are much more energetic and revealing, with a clear focus on upper mids and treble clarity.
Summary:
• Wan’er 2: Smooth, warm, and easy to love
• EA500: Bright, vivid, and exciting — more “hi-fi” sounding
Bass
• EA500 bass is fast, clean, and responsive — not the most elevated, but it slams when needed with great control and texture, especially in the subbass.
• Wan’er 2 bass is more relaxed — still punchy and present, but more rounded and soft around the edges. There’s less texture and definition, though it’s pleasing for casual listening.

• EA500: Tight, technical, more dynamic
• Wan’er 2: Gentle, smooth, less detailed
Midrange
• Wan’er 2 midrange is arguably its strongest suit — vocals are natural, lush, and organic. There's warmth and emotional engagement here, even if not the most detailed.
• EA500 mids are more neutral and analytical — excellent detail retrieval, especially with female vocals, but also sharper and more forward, which may come off as shouty or hot to sensitive ears (especially with the red nozzle).

• Wan’er 2: Warm, smooth, relaxed mids
• EA500: Detailed, forward, more analytical mids
Treble
• EA500’s treble is lively and sparkly, with plenty of air and microdetails. It's where the EA500 pulls ahead of many sub-$100 IEMs — but it can also veer into fatiguing territory, especially at higher volumes or with brighter tracks.
• Wan’er 2’s treble is mellow, smooth, and free of harshness. It's easy to listen to but also a little rolled off — you’re getting comfort over detail.

• EA500: Crisp, airy, and revealing
• Wan’er 2: Relaxed and non-fatiguing, but less detailed
Technicalities
• Detail retrieval: EA500 takes this easily. Every pluck, reverb, or vocal nuance is more clearly rendered.
• Imaging & separation: EA500 is more precise, with sharper imaging and better instrument layering.
• Soundstage: EA500 feels wider and more open. Wan’er 2 is more intimate, “closer-in,” but not congested.
• Dynamics: EA500 sounds more alive and dynamic; Wan’er 2 is smoother, less punchy.
Build & Fit
• EA500’s metal shells feel solid and premium but can be a bit heavier. The mirror finish is pretty but a fingerprint magnet.
• Wan’er 2’s resin shells are lightweight and comfy with no sharp edges. Not as flashy, but ergonomics win here.
Stock accessories also favor the Wan’er 2, thanks to the Tangzu Sancai tips and upgraded cable (especially if you got the 4.4mm version). EA500’s stock cable is basic and tips may need replacing.

Which One’s Right for You?
• Get the Wan’er 2 if you want a more natural, chill, and warm sound that works well for long listening sessions — especially if you’re treble-sensitive.
• Go for the EA500 if you want a more energetic, detailed, and technically strong IEM — something closer to a mini reference tuning, especially with the red nozzle

The Wan’er 2 is like a cozy café on a rainy day — warm, smooth, and inviting.
The EA500 is more like a clean glass of sparkling water — refreshing, bright, and attention-grabbing.
Both are excellent in their own right — it just comes down to whether you're in the mood for comfort or clarity.

vs TINHiFi T7
They live in different price range, the Wan’er 2 and the T7 also feels like they’re playing in two different genres. One’s focused on musicality and balance, while the other leans more toward technical flair and treble-forward energy.

Tuning & Overall Tonality
• Wan’er 2 has a warm-neutral, Harman-inspired tuning that’s smooth, laid-back, and more focused on musicality. It sounds like it was designed to be inoffensive, enjoyable, and coherent.
• T7, in contrast, is a bit of an oddball—leaning bright-neutral, with noticeable upper mid and treble emphasis. It feels a little more “technical” in approach, but it may not be as easy on the ears over long sessions.

• Wan’er 2: musical, relaxed, natural-sounding
• T7: leaner, brighter, and more analytical
Bass
• T7’s bass is tight but lean—subbass rolls off early, and midbass isn’t particularly punchy either. It’s clean, sure, but lacks warmth and authority.
• Wan’er 2 offers more bass presence—not boomy, but more body and punch in the midbass. Subbass is modest but enough to add weight. It feels more natural and better balanced.

• Wan’er 2: fuller, more present bass with musical texture
• T7: clean but thin; bas tuning overall more detailed and higher resolution.
Midrange
• Wan’er 2 excels here—its mids are the star of the show. Vocals are smooth, tonally accurate, with a touch of warmth that makes instruments and singers sound inviting.
• T7’s mids are more sterile, especially the lower mids, which can come across as dry and slightly recessed. Upper mids are more aggressive, and female vocals can sound a bit shouty depending on the track.

• Wan’er 2: lush, warm, realistic vocals
• T7: clean but thin, more focused on upper mids
Treble
• T7 is brighter overall, with a forward treble that brings out sparkle and detail—but it can also be fatiguing or borderline harsh, at higher volumes.
• Wan’er 2’s treble is smoother and more laid-back, with enough air to give detail without being fatiguing. It’s a more relaxed listen but lacks the same microdetail that the T7 can reveal.

• Wan’er 2: smoother and safer
• T7: brighter and more detailed, but potentially fatiguing
Technicalities
• Imaging & Separation: The T7 has slightly sharper imaging, thanks to its leaner and brighter sound.
• Soundstage: Neither is exceptionally wide or deep, but the T7 can feel more open due to the treble focus, while Wan’er 2 sounds more intimate but layered well.
• Detail Retrieval: T7 pulls out more microdetails, but sometimes at the cost of tonal realism. Wan’er 2 sounds more “right” overall, even if it’s not as technically flashy.
Build & Comfort
• Wan’er 2’s resin shell is lightweight and ergonomic. It also comes with better stock tips (Tang Sancai) and an improved cable over the original.
• T7 has an aluminum shell, more premium in feel, but some people might find the fit tricky due to the weight and nozzle angle.
Which Should You Choose?
• Get the Wan’er 2 if you value smoothness, natural tonality, great vocals, and a fatigue-free sound. It’s the better all-rounder and more forgiving of poor recordings.
• Choose the T7 if you’re a fan of brighter, technical-sounding IEMs, and you prioritize detail retrieval and separation over warmth and musicality.

Final Thoughts
The Wan’er 2 feels like it was tuned by someone who really understands human ears and daily listening preferences. The T7, while impressive in certain technical areas, is more of a niche pick—great for detail lovers, but less emotionally engaging overall, but personally i still prefer the T7 for me its just better overall.

Final Thoughts: A Budget IEM That Aims Higher

The Tangzu Wan’er 2 is an honest, well-thought-out upgrade to the original. It may not be as instantly fun or bass-heavy, but it trades that raw energy for maturity, control, and better overall refinement. It competes in a category that’s increasingly crowded, yet it manages to hold its own by offering a cohesive, smooth, and musical sound that honestly feels like it belongs in a higher price tier.

If you’re after a budget IEM with natural vocals, a well-balanced tuning, and zero harshness, the Wan’er 2 is a strong contender. And if you're coming from the OG Wan’er and wondering if this is a worthy follow-up—the answer is yes, just don’t expect the same punch; expect something more grown up.

Link: https://www.linsoul.com/products/ta...SPe_OSRRX5za1Odw9klA53NJPURybGp5mMU8IcgLkG7DG